![]() 10/10/2019 at 17:59 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
There are a bunch of these in the parking
garage at my office, and a
ny time I see one I keep
thinking
the greenhouse sits too far back. I realize the E-class has a similar profile but it at least has the longer
wheelbase to pull it off and doesn’t look so out of proportion.
![]() 10/10/2019 at 18:08 |
|
Headroom?
![]() 10/10/2019 at 18:11 |
|
sometimes the E and S class look strikingly similar... the C class’s constrained proportions make it easy to distinguis
h
![]() 10/10/2019 at 18:23 |
|
It’s not quite long enough to pull off the S-class droopy butt look
![]() 10/10/2019 at 18:59 |
|
I like it! All it needs is a hood ornament
There is nothing with a long hood. If you disagree, look under the h
ood of a 4th gen F-body or one of those American full-size vans. The engine belongs under the HOOD, not under the windshield
![]() 10/10/2019 at 21:20 |
|
yeah.. the droopy butt bugs me... but otherwise its nice.
![]() 10/11/2019 at 04:42 |
|
Or... and hear me out... just slide the back wheels back about 2 inches. Problem solved.
![]() 10/11/2019 at 04:45 |
|
It also doesn't help that the entire side of the car is bisected by a character line that starts right at the headlight and then arbitrarily ceases before it crosses the rear door. Makes the whole rear slab look hugely out of place.
![]() 10/11/2019 at 09:28 |
|
The ass end is too stubby though to balance the long hood. If the trunk was a little longer it’d work.
![]() 10/11/2019 at 09:30 |
|
That would just make the rear end look even stubbier.